Shaw v. First State Bank of Iowa Park
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
*138On Motion for Rehearing.
Numerous objections are urged to the conclusions presented in our original opinion. Perhaps the vital contentions are that the writ of mandamus is a legal remedy, and that appellant is entitled to an unconditional order of the court requiring the bank to transfer upon its books the 25 shares of capital stock which had been pledged by Holbrook to the Security State Bank of Fort Worth, regardless of whether or not the appellee bank of Iowa Park was entitled to a lien as asserted by it. Another contention stressed in the motion is to the effect that the answer of the Iowa…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aycock v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- B. and L. Assn. v. Madden, Secretary of StateTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Steele v. Goodrich and WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Corbin Banking Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910