Legal Opinion
State v. Owens
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided January 20, 1988No. 87-444PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
Daniel Ray Owens contends in this appeal that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress the results of a urine test taken under the implied consent law, chapter 321B. The test was given by police officers following an automobile accident in which Owens was injured and another driver was killed.
Owens alleges the officers lacked reasonable grounds to require him to submit to chemical testing pursuant to Iowa Code sections 321B.3 and 321B.4 (1985). He also alleges he submitted to the urine test only after the officers threatened to use physical force to make…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. CullisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- United States v. William Michael Faruolo and Anthony BernardezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. ReinierSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Rife v. D.T. Corner, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- State v. SaternSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- State v. StanfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.