Tube Reducing Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

We concur in the judgment of the former Supreme Court and, generally, in the reasoning of the deliverance of Mr. Justice Colie for the court.

The court found as a fact that there was “a stoppage of work * * * because of a labor dispute” at the respondent employer’s plant, where Carlucci was employed, and that he “was ‘participating in * * * the labor dispute,’ ” and was therefore ineligible for benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Act (R. S. 43:21-1 et seq.), and liable under section 43:- 21-16(d) for the repayment of the benefits…