Legal Opinion

State v. Gooch

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 2004No. A04A0792PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

The State appeals from an order of the Gwinnett Superior Court granting Clayton Jewell Gooch’s motion to suppress drugs located during a consent search of his person. Because the trial court’s ruling was based on an erroneous application of law to the facts of this case, we reverse.

The only evidence at the motion to suppress was adduced from the testimony of the two officers on the scene; Gooch did not testify or otherwise contest the officers’ testimony. “When reviewing a trial court’s order on a motion to suppress where the facts are undisputed, we apply a de novo standard…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Gamble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Sutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Milby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Swan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stagg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. State v. GodboltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API