Ellis Bell v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Ellis Bell appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, because his attorney failed to move for a directed verdict at his state-court trial. Ordinarily every criminal defense lawyer routinely moves for a directed verdict at the close of the prosecution’s case and at the close of all the evidence, and normally it is counsel’s duty to urge every plausible theory of defense. Here, however, counsel believed that such a motion, if…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Breakfield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gary Lawrence v. A.L. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- McCoy v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996