Legal Opinion

Ellis Bell v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1984No. 83-2449PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Ellis Bell appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, because his attorney failed to move for a directed verdict at his state-court trial. Ordinarily every criminal defense lawyer routinely moves for a directed verdict at the close of the prosecution’s case and at the close of all the evidence, and normally it is counsel’s duty to urge every plausible theory of defense. Here, however, counsel believed that such a motion, if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Breakfield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gary Lawrence v. A.L. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. McCoy v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API