Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zommick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1949No. Appeal, 64PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The question raised on this appeal is whether the liability imposed by Section 3 of the Act of 1915 1 upon the persons therein designated for the maintenance of an inmate of a State institution is primary or secondary, the patient’s own common law liability in such regard is declared and continued by Section 1 of the Act.

In this suit, brought by the Commonwealth against a father to recover for his son’s maintenance in a State institution, the trial court ruled that, under the evidence in the case, it was incumbent upon the Commonwealth to establish the continuing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Harnish's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Clarence N. Beach v. Government of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  2. Levine v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. In Re Houghton EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  4. Giordano EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1958
  5. Lansing v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API