Legal Opinion

Richmond Traction Co. v. Hildebrand

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 18, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Henrico county rendered December 13, 1897, in an action of trespass on the case, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action of trespass on the case was brought by Mary B'. Hildebrand to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been sustained by her in consequence of the careless, negligent and reckless conduct of the plaintiff in error in running its electric cars over a certain highway extending from the city of Richmond to Oakwood Cemetery, in the county of Henrico.

The proceedings in the Circuit Court resulted in a verdict and judgment for $12,250.00 against the defendant company, which we are asked to review and reverse.

The court is of opinion that Instruction Ho. 5, given for the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  2. Washington Southern Railway Co. v. LaceySupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Richmond Railway & Electric Co. v. GarthrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  4. Dun v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Levy v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  2. Bass' Administrator v. Norfolk Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  3. Richmond Traction Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  4. Miller & Meyers v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  5. Powhatan Lime Co. v. Affleck's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API