Legal Opinion

Bell v. McDonald

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1923No. 15192PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Fred R. Bell, as indorsee of two promissory notes executed by H. R. McDonald, brought an action of assumpsit against the latter in the circuit court of Vermilion county. There was a jury trial, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. The judgment was affirmed by the Appellate Court and the plaintiff was allowed an appeal to this court.

The notes, for $1400 each, dated May 27, 1915, were payable five and six months after date, respectively, to the Pioneer Stock Powder Company and were indorsed by that company by A. G. Litson, its president, and by A. G. Lit-son individually. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Hodge v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Jordan v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Oakland Cemetery Ass'n of Lyons v. LakinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Main Bank of Chicago v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dill v. WidmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Casey v. BurnsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  5. Forest Preserve District v. Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1945

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API