Snyder v. A Floating Dry-Dock
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Admiralty. Libel in, rem.
1Opinion of the CourtNixon, J.
This suit is in rem, and is in the nature of a possessory action to recover the possession and delivery to the libelant of a floating dry-dock and floating pump, alleged in the libel to be her property. Her right of ownership is not denied in the answer, but the respondent, Thomas W. Mabb, claims that he has a lien upon the structure lor wharfage, and has the right to retain the possession until his demand is paid. The answer also raises the question of jurisdiction, and denies the right of the libelant to maintain such a suit in the admiralty. It must be conceded that the thing libeled is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Hendrick HudsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869
- Ward v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- The TiltonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1830
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert D. Cook v. Belden Concrete Products, Inc., Division of Rockwin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Louis L. Atkins v. Greenville Shipbuilding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Charles Barnes Co. v. One Dredge BoatDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1909
- Berton v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Dock Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- EVANS v. STARBUCKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.