Legal Opinion

Alexander Diaz Martinez v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 2017No. 12-71822Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Alexander Diaz-Martinez timely seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of the immigration judge’s (“U”) order finding him removable. We deny the petition.

1. The BIA correctly held that the admission of Petitioner’s earlier statements and other evidence violated neither 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c) nor the Fifth Amendment. Because Petitioner’s earlier statements were made days before the issuance of the notice to appear, § 287.3(c) does not apply. Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder, 558 F.3d 897, 901-02 (9th Cir. 2009); In re E-R-M-F-, 25 I. &…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberto Silva-Pereira v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Daniel Salvador Hernandez-Guadarrama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco SOLANO-GODINES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Samayoa-Martinez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Antonio Perez-Arceo v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API