Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Hastien
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 4, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*785Claimant and her husband retired to Colorado in 2003. In 2007, claimant returned to New York to work and be with family. Claimant was employed as an office assistant on a long-term temporary basis from April 2009 to September 2009 when she resigned and relocated to Colorado to be with her husband. Given these circumstances, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. Relocating to retire with and care for one’s spouse does…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of SimsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of TetlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of EnriquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of MoshierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of LahensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of LahensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- MatterofLahens[Commr.ofLabor]Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014