McDonald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HORNBECK, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $3600.00, to which judgment but one error is assigned, namely, that the amount thereof is excessive.
We have carefully read the ecord and the briefs of the parties. The measure of damages was carefully and properly stated to the jury in the general charge. It is not claimed and there is not the slightest evidence, that the verdict was produced under the influence of passion and prejudice. The verdict was the unanimous hction of the' ■ members of the jury, was reviewed by the trial -court on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boze v. Indust. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. Wittenberg UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Fiorilli v. Sun Life Insurance Co. of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Jones v. Wittenberg UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Morrissey v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1954