Legal Opinion

Lesser v. Williams

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Ulrich Lesser against Sarah A. Williams. From an order changing the venue, on defendant’s motion, to Clinton county, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

The motion to change the venue was predicate of the allegations that the plaintiff at the time the action was commenced was, and still continued to be, a resident of Hoboken, in the state of New Jersey, and that the defendant was a resident of Plattsburg, Clinton county, in this state. It appears that the defendant served with her answer on the 10th day of October, 1888, under section 986, a demand in writing that the action, should be tried in the county of Clinton, in this state, that being the proper county for the trial, and that the place of trial be changed accordingly. These papers…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Binder v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Peerless Motor Co. v. HambletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. State Board of Pharmacy v. RhinehardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Schlesinger v. Borough BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API