Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Weltz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 2005PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a contested probate proceeding, the objectant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated August 4, 2003, as granted those branches of the petitioners’ motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the second and third objections to probate, and that portion of the fourth objection which *429alleged that the proponents procured the will through the exercise of undue influence, and admitted the will to probate.
Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Surrogate’s Court properly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Will of WaltherNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- In Re the Estate of KumstarNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Children's Aid Society v. . LoveridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- In re the Estate of HermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by21 opinions
- Doviak v. Finkelstein & Partners, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Estate of EastmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Estate of TuccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re Estate of MoskoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re Estate of CoopersmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.