Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Holland

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 3, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Howell, S.

The pro forma order fixing the transfer tax in this estate was made October 11, 1929. No appeal was taken therefrom. On the clear market value of the property passing under decedent’s will appraised as of the date of her death, executors’ commissions were allowed and deducted at that time in the estimated sum of $21,604.32. At the time of the accounting in the estate, the assets had increased in value to such an extent that the executors’ commissions amounted to and were allowed in the sum of $22,884.66, being $1,280.34 in excess of the amount estimated in the transfer tax…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GihonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of PenfoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. In re SillimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. In re the Appraisal of the Estate of WilletsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JagnowNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of FordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  3. In re the Estate of McNeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API