Legal Opinion

Hapner v. Rolf Brauchli, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1978No. 58977, (Calendar No. 4)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

(for remand). While I agree with my colleague that the requisite "minimum contacts” 1 justifying the exercise of long-arm jurisdiction may be established without proof of "solicitation, sale or delivery within the state of injury by the defendant [manufacturer] to the plaintiff”, an out-of-state manufacturer is not subject to Michigan long-arm jurisdiction merely because one of its products was brought into Michigan and caused harm to a Michigan resident and it was foreseeable that might occur. "Proof alone that a nonresident caused an effect in Michigan that was foreseeable does not…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bonelli v. Volkswagen of America, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Le Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin v. District Court in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. Witbeck v. Bill Cody's Ranch InnMichigan Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API