Hapner v. Rolf Brauchli, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
(for remand). While I agree with my colleague that the requisite "minimum contacts” 1 justifying the exercise of long-arm jurisdiction may be established without proof of "solicitation, sale or delivery within the state of injury by the defendant [manufacturer] to the plaintiff”, an out-of-state manufacturer is not subject to Michigan long-arm jurisdiction merely because one of its products was brought into Michigan and caused harm to a Michigan resident and it was foreseeable that might occur. "Proof alone that a nonresident caused an effect in Michigan that was foreseeable does not…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Bonelli v. Volkswagen of America, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Le Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin v. District Court in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Witbeck v. Bill Cody's Ranch InnMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.