Legal Opinion

Menk Corp. v. Township Committee

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 24, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SERPENTELLI, A.J.S.C.

This Action in Lieu of Prerogative Writs raises an issue of first impression arising out of the implementation of the Mount Laurel doctrine.1 Menk Corporation (hereinafter “plaintiff’, “applicant” or “Menk”), seeks to compel the Barnegat Township Committee (hereinafter “Township” or “defendant”) to vacate three unimproved paper streets so that Menk may proceed with a 347-unit inclusionary development that will provide thirty-five affordable housing units.

Plaintiff appeared before the Barnegat Township Planning Board on June 24 and July 22, 2003, seeking preliminary site…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Pyatt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of DunellenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Housing Authority of Newark v. Norfolk Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. Wolff v. Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 4715Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. VINCENT LEPORE VS. BOROUGH OF SEA BRIGHT (L-1090-16, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API