Legal Opinion

Lund v. Seneca County Sheriff's Department

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 12, 2000No. Nos. 99-3815, 99-3816PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs, Larry and wife Deborah Lund, two licensed bail bond underwriters from Florida, sued the Ohio law enforcement officers listed in the caption above, claiming constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and numerous common law torts under Ohio law. The action arises from the arrest and prosecution of plaintiff Larry Lund by defendants for his behavior while arresting Michael Gish, an alleged fugitive bail jumper from Florida for whom the Lunds had written a bail bond. Lund entered the home of a third party in Ohio where Gish was alone with two small…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Nicolls v. IngersoliNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  3. United States v. Van FossenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1871
  4. Respublica v. Gaoler of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1798
  5. Ruggles v. CoreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1820

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Larry R. Lund Deborah Lund, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees, Mark L. Loop v. Seneca County Sheriff's Department Seneca County Prosecutor's Office, Defendants-Appellees(99-3815), Paul F. Kutscher, Jr. Richard F. Dohner D. L. Gadberry, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants, Clyde Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API