Legal Opinion

United States v. Jonathan Pinson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2017No. 15-4311PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published per curiam opinion. Judge Diaz wrote a dissenting opinion as to Parts II.A. and IV.

2Per curiam

Jonathan Pinson appeals his convictions for conspiracy to participate in a racketeering enterprise under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), government program theft, honest services fraud, mail and wire fraud, money laundering, and making false statements to federal agencies. He argues that there was insufficient evidence for a jury to convict him, and also contends that the district court constructively amended the…

3Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. Marcus TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Sean AthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Martin HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  4. Patrick v. Dell Financial ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. United States v. Jong KimCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API