Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Samuel A. Moreno, Debtor. Samuel A. Moreno v. Michael Ashworth
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1990No. 89-1202PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:
The district court affirmed a judgment of the bankruptcy court, which held that a significant debt owed by Samuel A. Moreno was non-dischargeable, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4), and that Moreno could not receive a discharge in bankruptcy because he had attempted to conceal property from his creditors. 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A). 102 B.R. 65. We affirm the lower courts’ judgment on the dischargeability of the debt owed by Moreno to Petroleum Energy Equipment Company (PEEC), but we reverse the judgment denying him a discharge.
Moreno was the president of Petroleum Energy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. HerbstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Gearhart Industries, Inc. v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Moreno v. AshworthDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
3Cited by101 opinions
- Meyer v. RigdonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In the Matter Of: Bruce Barton Schwager, Debtor. Bruce Barton Schwager v. Meyer Fallas Fred Fallas William Cramer Malcolm MarcoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Bennett v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Sheerin v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Zohlman v. ZoldanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.