Frantz v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge.
The sole issue raised in this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission in a workmen’s compensation pro ceeding is whether the petitioner should have been awarded compensation benefits for a three month period during which time he was outside the state of Arizona without the approval of the Commission.
The petitioner agrees that the facts show that he left the state while the necessity for having medical treatment continued, without obtaining the written approval of the Commission, although he did obtain the oral consent of his doctor. In our opinion the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carabetta v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Meva Corporation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Continental Casualty Co. v. MejiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- Waxler v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Hesser v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Hurley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Hurley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1984