Legal Opinion

Sumner v. Beeler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1875PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Erom the Marion Civil Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, C. J.

This suit was. brought by the appellee against the appellants, to recover damages for an illegal arrest, imprisonment, prosecution, and causing him to be fined on the charge of being found drunk, under the ninth section of the Baxter bill of 1873.

The defendants answered jointly and separately, by the general denial and by a third paragraph in justification under the ninth section of said law.

*342A demurrer for want of sufficient facts was sustained to this paragraph, and this ruling is assigned for error.

This section has been held to be unconstitutional, or, in other words, that it is not law.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. MathuesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Saloom v. HolderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Oölitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API