Legal Opinion
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company Inc
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 20, 2018No. 1:17-cv-06940Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DANIELS SHARPSMART, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 17 C 6940 ) BECTON, DICKINSON AND CO., INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. has moved to dismiss the counterclaim of Becton, Dickinson and Co.. Becton claims that Daniels made false and misleading statements in advertising its "reusable Sharpsmart system," in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and the Illinois Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 815 ILCS…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Basf Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Old World Trading Company, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Gimix, Inc. v. Js & a Group, Inc., Auto Page, Inc., and Iwata Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- B. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.