Legal Opinion

Javinsky-Wenzek v. City of St. Louis Park

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 2, 2011No. Civil No. 11-2228 (JRT/JSM)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Michael and Deborah Javinsky-Wenzek (“the Javinsky-Wenzeks”) bring this action claiming violations of their substantive and procedural due process rights and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. The Javinsky-Wenzeks are landlords in the City of St. Louis Park (“the City”). On January 21, 2011, the City sent Michael Javinsky-Wenzek a letter ordering that he and his wife terminate a tenants’ lease pursuant to the City’s Crime Free/Drug Free Ordinance. The Javinsky-Wenzeks seek a preliminary…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API