Legal Opinion

In re Brown

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1995No. 73,450PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator as petitioner against Fred H. Brown, an attorney admitted to the practice of law. The issue is whether Brown, who had been temporarily suspended from the practice of law and was in federal prison, should have been granted a continuance by the hearing panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys (the panel), thus allowing him to appear personally.

Brown was convicted on two felony counts. While incarcerated in South Dakota, Brown received notice of his disciplinary hearing to be held in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. FregosoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re KershnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. FolioWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re SmootSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  5. State v. RomeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re WoodringSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. In Re BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API