Fox v. . Horah
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was a bill filed in Mecklenburg Court of Equity. The plaintiff had obtained an injunction from a Judge out of court, and at Fall Term, 1840, of the said court, a motion was made by the defendant to dissolve the injunction, and his Honor Judge Settle, upon hearing the motion, ordered the injunction to be dissolved with costs. From this decree the plaintiff, by leave, appealed to the Supreme Court. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion delivered in this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Gaston, L
A loan ofmoney was obtained by one John G. Hoskins from the late State Bank of North Carolina, by the discount at the Salisbury Branch of said bank, of a note execu ted by said Hoskins as principal and Stephen Fox and William W. Long as sureties; payable at said branch to William M. Horah, cashier thereof. Upon this note an action at law was brought by Horah in the County Court of Mecklenburg against Hoskins, Fox and Long, which action was by successive appeals of the defendants carried up to the Superior Court of that county, and thence to this court, and a judgment was ultimately…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Broadfoot v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Wilson v. . LearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Richards v. Northwestern Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- University of North Carolina v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.