State Game & Fish Commission v. Louis Fritz Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion
I am of the opinion that the judgment of the court below should be reversed and the bill dismissed, because in my opinion what was done in this case was authorized by law; and that Louis Fritz Company, complainants in the court below, appellees here, had no right in the fish captured and sold under the arrangement made by the State Game and Fish Commission, in its effort to protect the game fish in South Horn Lake, or Lake View, in waters over the land of the complainant, Louis Fritz Company.
Chapter 123, Laws of 1932, is quite comprehensive, and it would be difficult to set forth the many…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Steamboat Magnolia v. MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
- Ex parte FritzMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. HillMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
- Barataria Canning Co. v. OttMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. BuckinghamMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.