Legal Opinion

In re Cox-Rackley Co.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided August 21, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the Cox-Rackley Company, bankrupt. On petition for review of an order of the referee dismissing a summary proceeding by the trustee.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, District Judge.

The referee’s certificate discloses the following case:

Prior to February 12, 1917, respondent Plomer Brock recovered a judgment for the sum of $28.90 against Cox-Rackley Company. Respondents Langston, Allen & Taylor, attorneys at law, representing certain nonresident creditors, on or about the same date, recovered several judgments against said Cox-Rackley Company, aggregating the sum of $1,428.74. Executions were issued upon all of said judgments, returnable to the superior court of Wayne county, and placed in the hands of respondent D. G. Rhodes, deputy sheriff of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Murphy v. John Hofman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ableman v. ConowaySuperior Court of Delaware · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API