Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1915No. 14PublishedCited by 3 opinions

W. O. Smith was convicted of using the mails to defraud, and he moves for a new trial and in arrest of judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The first reason assigned in arrest of judgment is that the proofs adduced at the trial fell short of the averments of the indictment. The facts in the case, from the viewpoint presented on this motion, are that the defendant was a practicing physician and a specialist in certain forms of nervous diseases, which he was because of this able to successfully treat. The indictment charged the scheme or artifice to defraud consisted, among other things, in the defendant falsely representing himself to be a physician and a specialist as above stated. No proof of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Popham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API