Legal Opinion

Mattson v. Jarmag Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is .an application by the plaintiff to restrain the defendant, pendente lite, from interfering with plaintiff’s occupancy of an apartment. The defendant, owner of the apartment house, had discharged the plaintiff, its superintendent, and had notified the plaintiff to remove from the premises, which he (with his family) had been occupying as an employee of the defendant. The plaintiff refused to vacate, and instituted this suit to enjoin the defendant from effectuating dispossession. Section 1410 of the Civil Practice Act provides, among other things, for summary proceedings to remove…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marluted Realty Corp. v. DeckerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  2. Spezio v. Sutphin-Flushing Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Harris v. HertzbergNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API