Sampson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant asserts that his aggravated battery conviction was improperly reclassified from a second to a first-degree felony based on the use of a weapon, because use of a weapon is an essential element of aggravated battery.
If an aggravated battery conviction arises merely from the use of a weapon, and not because of great bodily harm, reclassification is prohibited, as use of a weapon is an essential element of the charge. See Thomas v. State, 932 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Perry v. State, 858 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Where it is unclear whether the defendant was found guilty of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Montgomery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brady v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011