Legal Opinion

(SS) Michael Clamp v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 19, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01625Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL CLAMP, Case No. 1:19-cv-01625-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES 13 v. PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF Nos. 24, 25, 26) SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Petitioner Jonathan O. Pena (“Counsel” or “Petitioner”), attorney for Plaintiff Michael 20 Clamp (“Plaintiff”), filed the instant amended motion for attorney fees on April 18, 2022. (ECF 21 No. 24.) Counsel requests fees in the net amount of $12,000.00 pursuant to

42…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Hearn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  4. Martin v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API