Legal Opinion
State v. Darcy
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 16, 1981No. 80-248PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The issues in this manslaughter case are whether RSA 630:2, 1(a) (1974) (current version at Supp. 1979) is void for vagueness, whether the indictment was constitutionally sufficient, whether the evidence was sufficient to support a guilty verdict, and whether the sentence imposed by the court was excessive. We reject the defendant’s arguments and affirm.
An indictment dated June 18, 1979, charged the defendant with violating RSA 630:2,1(a) and alleged in part that
“Bruce Darcy did knowingly cause the death of Florence Nudd at her residence on Dogtown Rd., Exeter N.H. by shooting her once in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. WentworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
- State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ThresherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. ShuteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.