Legal Opinion

Boles v. Sun Ergoline, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 8, 2010No. 08SC970PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats

Boles petitioned for review of the court of appeals' unpublished opinion affirming a summary judgment in favor of Sun Ergoline, the manufacturer of a tanning booth in which she was injured. The district court found that Boles's strict products liability claim was barred by a release she signed as a condition of using the tanning facilities On direct appeal, the court of appeals concluded that the district court correctly applied the four-part test prescribed by this court for determining whether exculpatory agreements releasing service providers from liability for their simple negligence…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air Brake Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. N.M. Ex Rel. Lopez v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. v. MeagherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  3. Espinoza v. Arkansas Valley Adventures, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Heinrich v. Master Craft Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2015
  5. Brigance v. Vail Summit Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API