Boles v. Sun Ergoline, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats
Boles petitioned for review of the court of appeals' unpublished opinion affirming a summary judgment in favor of Sun Ergoline, the manufacturer of a tanning booth in which she was injured. The district court found that Boles's strict products liability claim was barred by a release she signed as a condition of using the tanning facilities On direct appeal, the court of appeals concluded that the district court correctly applied the four-part test prescribed by this court for determining whether exculpatory agreements releasing service providers from liability for their simple negligence…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air Brake Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- N.M. Ex Rel. Lopez v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- v. MeagherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- Espinoza v. Arkansas Valley Adventures, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Heinrich v. Master Craft Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Brigance v. Vail Summit Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.