Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lighthouse Pointe Property Associates LLC v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 2009Published

1Dissent

Smith, J.P. (dissenting).

Because I conclude that respondent New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) misinterpreted the statutes applicable to the determination underlying the judgment in this proceeding, resulting in the arbitrary and capricious exclusion of petitioner’s parcels from the Brownfield Cleanup Program ([BCP] ECL 27-1401 et seq.), I respectfully dissent and would affirm.

The parties correctly agree that the narrow issue presented on this appeal is whether the DEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in concluding that petitioner’s proposed redevelopment sites do…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Toys" R" US v. SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Emunim v. Town of FallsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Moran Towing & Transportation Co. v. New York State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SteckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API