Legal Opinion

Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 14, 2002No. A109609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, P. J.

Pursuant to ORS 183.400(1), petitioner filed separate petitions for judicial review of Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision rules OAR 255-050-0005(2) and OAR 255-050-0013, which authorize the board to postpone a parole release date if an inmate refuses to undergo a psychiatric evaluation ordered pursuant to ORS 144.223. In this proceeding, petitioner challenges the validity of OAR 255-050-0013. The board filed a motion to dismiss the petition, arguing that — as a matter of statutory standing — petitioner must be adversely affected or aggrieved by the rule in order to challenge it and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. WaterWatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Lovelace v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POSTPRISON SUPERVISIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API