Rhea v. Yoder

Yoder, the defendant here, was complainant in the court below, and it appears that the money he claims was originally due to the persons by whose testimony he principally supports his claim, and of whom he is the assignee.

In thi's court, almost the whole reliance of the other party to defeat the claim is the incompeteney of those persons to be witnesses in the cause. But exceptions to their testimony not having been taken at the original trial, this court can not with propriety exclude it. And by this testimony, in aid of other evidence exhibited, it is abundantly proven that if Rhea was not…