Legal Opinion

Feeney v. Eastern Racing Ass'n

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 27, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

In this action of contract the plaintiff seeks to recover $2.70 as an award or dividend upon a wager of $2 placed by him upon a horse. The horse was one of the winners in a race, held at a racing meeting conducted by the defendant in accordance with the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 128A, inserted by St. 1934, c. 374. The defendant admits that it owes the plaintiff $2.60. The plaintiff excepted to a finding in his favor in the last mentioned amount.

Ordinarily, the amount in controversy would not warrant judicial review at public expense even if the parties were content to assume and pay…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Utah State Fair Ass'n v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. The People v. MonroeIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Dowling v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Boyden v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Finlay v. Eastern Racing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Sullivan v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  3. United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Gale Shoe Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. State v. FeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Delaware Steeplechase & Race Ass'n v. WiseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API