Legal Opinion
State v. Olympic Club
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 6, 1895No. 11,788PublishedCited by 8 opinions
A PPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Rightor. J.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McEnery, J.
The case is before us on a second appeal. The case was remanded for the reason that inadmissible testimony had been received on the first trial. State vs. Olympic Club, 46 An. 935. The object of remanding the case was for a re-trial, excluding the illegal testimony, so as to determine whether or not the injunction prayed for should be granted, restraining the defendant from giving exhibitions of prize fights, although called glove contests. We refer to the original opinion in the case for the facts, excluding the statements of experts.
The…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte RoperCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Commonwealth v. McGovernCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Respass v. Comth. ex rel. Atty. Gen'lCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Inter-Continental Promotions, Inc. v. William B. MacDonald Jr., and New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- State v. BarbeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.