Legal Opinion

Joseph Richard Rozsa v. State of Texas for the Protection of Jaime Danilo Pesantes

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 7, 2025No. 03-24-00667-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00667-CV Joseph Richard Rozsa, Appellant v. State of Texas for the Protection of Jaime Danilo Pesantes, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-24-004511, THE HONORABLE MICHAEL DENTON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION The trial court issued a protective order barring Joseph Richard Rozsa from communicating with Jaime Danilo Pesantes and his family for ten years. Rozsa contends that the court lacked jurisdiction, that the county attorney lacked authority to represent Pesantes, that the trial court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mansfield State Bank v. CohnTexas Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API