Legal Opinion

Haines v. Haines

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Sycked, J.

This is a suit against Burwood M. Haines, Joseph M. Haines, Samuel W. Haines, Walter Haines and Nancy M. Leeds, heirs-at-law of Abel Haines, who died in 1883, for the bond debt of the said decedent, amounting to $2,000.

*40The defendants admit that they inherited a farm containing one hundred and thirty-two and seventy-five hundredths acres, situate in the county of Burlington, on which the said Abel Haines, in his lifetime, executed a mortgage, in which his wife joined, for the sum of $5',934.

The defendants Burwood M. Iiaines and Joseph M.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Outwater v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  2. Joss v. MohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York Trust Co. v. BrewsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Weidenhammer v. McAdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Cumberland National Bank v. ShillingsburgSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API