Legal Opinion
Weitzberg v. Nassau County Department of Recreation & Parks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for reinstatement and back pay, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered January 29, 2004, which denied their second motion for leave to renew a prior motion for class action status.
*683Ordered that the appeals by the plaintiffs Ira Weitzenberg, Carol Gartner, Steve Pilla, Marilyn Gressler, Ethel Zamurut, George Pinola, Maebell Mickens, and Cynthia Brown are deemed withdrawn, pursuant to a stipulation of settlement dated April 18, 2005; and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Dupack v. Nationwide Leisure Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Chimenti v. American Express Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Weitzenberg v. Nassau County Department of Recreation & ParksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Rallis v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of New York v. SeguiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Weitzenberg v. Nassau County Department of Recreation & ParksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008