Fasolino v. Charming Stores, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed.
In this negligence action for a slip and fall in defendant’s store, there was no evidence that defendant had notice of any slippery condition prior to plaintiffs fall; the testimony at most showed that defendant’s manager learned of a slippery condition from the fall. In that the evidence was insufficient to establish the element of notice, the complaint should have been dismissed (Anderson v Klein’s Foods, 73 NY2d 835, 836, affg 139 AD2d 904).
The evidence offered by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anderson v. Klein's Foods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Anderson v. Klein's Foods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bykofsky v. Waldbaum's Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Moss v. JNK Capital Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Kaufman v. Man-Dell Food Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Edwards v. Terryville Meat Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Columbo v. James River, II, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.