Legal Opinion · Dissent

S. Twitchell Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1957No. 586-53Published

1Dissent

LARAMORE, Judge (dissenting).

I believe plaintiff should be denied drawbacks for the periods herein claimed on the ground that it has failed to fully comply with the regulations as prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

Treasury Regulation 29-197.23 provides:

“Information to be shown by the claim. The claim must set forth, under oath, the following:
“(a) * * *
“(b) * * *
“(c) * * *
“(d) That the nonbeverage products were manufactured in compliance with (1) quantitative formulas filed with the Commissioner on Form 1678 prior to or at the time of manufacture, or (2) formulas prescribed by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Walker-Hill Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API