Legal Opinion · Dissent
S. Twitchell Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 5, 1957No. 586-53Published
1Dissent
LARAMORE, Judge (dissenting).
I believe plaintiff should be denied drawbacks for the periods herein claimed on the ground that it has failed to fully comply with the regulations as prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Treasury Regulation 29-197.23 provides:
“Information to be shown by the claim. The claim must set forth, under oath, the following:
“(a) * * *
“(b) * * *
“(c) * * *
“(d) That the nonbeverage products were manufactured in compliance with (1) quantitative formulas filed with the Commissioner on Form 1678 prior to or at the time of manufacture, or (2) formulas prescribed by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Walker-Hill Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1948