State v. Clay
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Defendant is African-American. He argues that the trial court’s disallowance of his objection to the state’s peremptory challenges of all three of the African-American jurors in the 27-person jury pool violated his right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution. He relies on Batson v. Kentucky, 476 US 79, 106 S Ct 1712, 90 L Ed 2d 69 (1986), and related cases as support for that argument. We agree with defendant and vacate and remand.
During voir dire, the prosecuting attorney…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.