Legal Opinion

State v. Clay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 18, 2001No. 9702-31436; A98207Published

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Defendant is African-American. He argues that the trial court’s disallowance of his objection to the state’s peremptory challenges of all three of the African-American jurors in the 27-person jury pool violated his right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution. He relies on Batson v. Kentucky, 476 US 79, 106 S Ct 1712, 90 L Ed 2d 69 (1986), and related cases as support for that argument. We agree with defendant and vacate and remand.

During voir dire, the prosecuting attorney…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API