Legal Opinion

Rockmore v. Epstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.

The plaintiff moves to strike out two separate defenses in the answer of the defendant Altman. He has consented to the first separate defense in his answer being stricken out. The contested question is with reference to the sufficiency of the second separate defense. In that defense defendant Altman sets up that the note on which he is being sued was usurious and that' plaintiff took it with knowledge of that fact. Plaintiff asserts that as the note was made by a corporation with several individuals signing as comakers, the defense of usury is not available to the individual comakers because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosa v. . ButterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Ludington v. KirkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  2. Pink v. L. Kaplan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Cabrera v. OlsenNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Kings Mercantile Co. v. CooperNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Ollendorf v. LissbergerNew York Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API