State v. Cantwell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by Robert C. Cantwell from a judgment of Judge W. R. Allen at tbe April Term, 1906, of tbe Superior Court of New PIaNOveR.
1DissentWalxeb, J.
It is impossible for me to assent either to the conclusion or to the reasoning of the majority. On both points involved in the case, I entertain an opinion different from that which has been delivered by the Chief Jus-iice for the Court. In the first place, I do not think the statute under which the defendant claims exemption from jury service has been repealed by the Revisal. The rule is well settled that repeals by implication are not favored. State v. Perkins, 141 N. C., 797. The two statutes should be irreconcilable with each other before such an implication can arise, and when any fair…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Jefferson Branch Bank v. SkellySupreme Court of the United States · 1862
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.