Legal Opinion

People v. Dunn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*942Defendant also contends that reversal is mandated because of the prosecutor’s failure to give an adequate racially neutral explanation for his peremptory challenge of a black juror (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). Since defense counsel failed to raise his Batson challenge until after the jury was sworn, his objection was untimely and this issue has not been preserved for our review (see, People v Harris, 151 AD2d 961).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J. — rape, first degree.) Present —…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. BrazeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. People v. FioriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Caston v. CostelloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  5. People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API