Legal Opinion

Stone v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 27, 1986No. CR 84-175PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

After the appeal of Mark Stone’s conviction was submitted to us for resolution, he filed a petition for a writ of error coram nobis, requesting we stay the appeal. We are contemporaneously affirming his conviction on appeal and denying this petition. See Stone v. State, 290 Ark. 204, 718 S.W.2d 102 (1986).

The basis of the petition is that the state withheld from the defense a memorandum of an interview with James Edward Collum which took place on October 22,1984. This was approximately two weeks before Stone’s trial. The memorandum stated that Collum was interviewed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API