Legal Opinion

Wentz Equipment Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 29, 1983No. 55,756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woleslagel, J.:

Wentz Equipment Company, Inc., appellant (Wentz), purchased equipment which was delivered to an initial carrier in good condition but loaded improperly by the shipper or the initial carrier. The evidence did not identify the loader. When the shipment was received in damaged condition, Wentz sued Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, appellee (MoPac), the final carrier. The suit is governed by the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 11707 (Supp. V 1982). The damage occurred in transit. While first finding for Wentz, the trial judge entered summary judgment for MoPac on rehearing,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Stith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Estate of Maguire v. McNuttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Masonite Corporation v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Masonite Corporation v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klein v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. C.M. Showroom, Inc. v. BoesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  3. Southwestern Business Systems, Inc. v. Western Kansas Xpress, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  4. State v. BraunSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API